Written By Orazio
March 21, 2018, 12:16 p.m.(5/25/1008 AR)
Relationship Note on Eleyna
The Archduchess claims in her journals to have been a poison to everyone who has loved her.
This is manifestly untrue, and it behooves me as a priest who has a great love for the Sentinel to dispute it. Grieve, your highness, for the lost are worthy of grief as a remembrance of all the love and light they brought to the lives of those who knew them. But despite your great power as Archduchess of the Lyceum, there are some things which are out of your control, and that includes the time in which loved ones pass. Princess Serafine's life was better for having you in it, and those of your people who have died did so under the rule of a worthy woman, defending the things and the people that they loved.
These are sacrifices that we all choose to make, though it may shatter the hearts of our loved ones when the price comes due. Take every moment with those who still live; take these losses as the memorial to remind us that everything changes, and winter comes to every person's life eventually - that is not the fault of we who love, or we who are loved. It is simply the way things are. It is never by loving that we poison those around us - only by refusing to love so that we do not open ourselves to hurt.
You are a balm in the world, and I know that Princess Serafine would agree - whether she would ever say so or not.
This is manifestly untrue, and it behooves me as a priest who has a great love for the Sentinel to dispute it. Grieve, your highness, for the lost are worthy of grief as a remembrance of all the love and light they brought to the lives of those who knew them. But despite your great power as Archduchess of the Lyceum, there are some things which are out of your control, and that includes the time in which loved ones pass. Princess Serafine's life was better for having you in it, and those of your people who have died did so under the rule of a worthy woman, defending the things and the people that they loved.
These are sacrifices that we all choose to make, though it may shatter the hearts of our loved ones when the price comes due. Take every moment with those who still live; take these losses as the memorial to remind us that everything changes, and winter comes to every person's life eventually - that is not the fault of we who love, or we who are loved. It is simply the way things are. It is never by loving that we poison those around us - only by refusing to love so that we do not open ourselves to hurt.
You are a balm in the world, and I know that Princess Serafine would agree - whether she would ever say so or not.
Written By Orazio
March 21, 2018, 7:13 a.m.(5/24/1008 AR)
Relationship Note on Estaban
Gods damn it.
You had potential, my young cousin, though it hurt to look at you at times - I never wished anything for you but a long and successful life protecting our people.
You had potential, my young cousin, though it hurt to look at you at times - I never wished anything for you but a long and successful life protecting our people.
Written By Orazio
March 18, 2018, 2:07 p.m.(5/19/1008 AR)
The acknowledgement of valor and triumph on the field of battle is always a bittersweet affair, for it must include those who can no longer be present to receive their accolades, for whom bravery demanded the ultimate cost - their lives - which they paid without reservation or hesitation.
For those souls who fought to the last drop of their heart's blood in both the north and the south, you have already been welcomed into the arms of the gods, and the Faith celebrates your lives, even as we mourn your loss for this world. Among the fallen, we particularly stand to recognize Lady Eirlys Greenmarch, who gave her life giving the wounded and those who heal them time to escape a foul enemy assault, and Grandmaster Armel Godsworn, of the Silver Order of the Knights of Solace, who - along with many other Silver Order Knights - aided in covering the withdrawal from the shores of Stormwall. The gods know these hearts, and may they find them to be pure. In addition, let us honor the dead who fought under the banner of the Church - at the end of this entry, you will find recorded for history the name of each fallen, Disciple or Godsworn, who answered the Faith's banner call. Letters of notification to their families or their superiors in the Church have already been dispatched.
But it is not just the dead that we honor, and as Gloria demands, we raise up those who have survived the trials of war, who have shed blood for a righteous cause an emerged triumphant and unbowed. I wish to take this time to praise those who fought under the banners of the Faith and stood fast against terrible foes. For the Templars, I wish to particularly acknowledge the deeds of heroism of: Princess Terese Valardin, who commanded the mounted knights of the Templars with valor and unyielding honor at Stormwall; Sir Preston of the Templars who fought and led with strategy and courage; Dame Thena Grayhope, who led the Knights of Solace and who showed unflinching skill in the work of a warrior and a general; Sir Jeffeth Bayweather, who fearlessly risked life and limb to pull the injured from the melee, blending Gloria's courage with Lagoma's mercy; Sir Daemon Dracone, who fought with the strength of ten to defend the wounded and the healers; and Sir Rand Pirran, who fought among the Templars with valor and fury.
Last - but never least, let us praise the Mercies of Lagoma, and the members of the Physician's Guild, who took to their battlefields not to take lives, but to save them. May no one ever forget the strength it takes to heal, and the Faith praises all of the Mercies and medics who saved lives and souls in both north and south. Each of these are heroes as valiant and strong as any who took up sword, bow, or glaive in the defense of the Compact. May the gods see how many of their people are willing to risk their lives to uphold virtue, and rejoice.
<<A list of names follows - a catalogue of dead godsworn and Disciples in the fighting, as well as a brief note of where they fell, and any deeds which were known in the battle. It is a long, long list.>>
For those souls who fought to the last drop of their heart's blood in both the north and the south, you have already been welcomed into the arms of the gods, and the Faith celebrates your lives, even as we mourn your loss for this world. Among the fallen, we particularly stand to recognize Lady Eirlys Greenmarch, who gave her life giving the wounded and those who heal them time to escape a foul enemy assault, and Grandmaster Armel Godsworn, of the Silver Order of the Knights of Solace, who - along with many other Silver Order Knights - aided in covering the withdrawal from the shores of Stormwall. The gods know these hearts, and may they find them to be pure. In addition, let us honor the dead who fought under the banner of the Church - at the end of this entry, you will find recorded for history the name of each fallen, Disciple or Godsworn, who answered the Faith's banner call. Letters of notification to their families or their superiors in the Church have already been dispatched.
But it is not just the dead that we honor, and as Gloria demands, we raise up those who have survived the trials of war, who have shed blood for a righteous cause an emerged triumphant and unbowed. I wish to take this time to praise those who fought under the banners of the Faith and stood fast against terrible foes. For the Templars, I wish to particularly acknowledge the deeds of heroism of: Princess Terese Valardin, who commanded the mounted knights of the Templars with valor and unyielding honor at Stormwall; Sir Preston of the Templars who fought and led with strategy and courage; Dame Thena Grayhope, who led the Knights of Solace and who showed unflinching skill in the work of a warrior and a general; Sir Jeffeth Bayweather, who fearlessly risked life and limb to pull the injured from the melee, blending Gloria's courage with Lagoma's mercy; Sir Daemon Dracone, who fought with the strength of ten to defend the wounded and the healers; and Sir Rand Pirran, who fought among the Templars with valor and fury.
Last - but never least, let us praise the Mercies of Lagoma, and the members of the Physician's Guild, who took to their battlefields not to take lives, but to save them. May no one ever forget the strength it takes to heal, and the Faith praises all of the Mercies and medics who saved lives and souls in both north and south. Each of these are heroes as valiant and strong as any who took up sword, bow, or glaive in the defense of the Compact. May the gods see how many of their people are willing to risk their lives to uphold virtue, and rejoice.
<<A list of names follows - a catalogue of dead godsworn and Disciples in the fighting, as well as a brief note of where they fell, and any deeds which were known in the battle. It is a long, long list.>>
Written By Orazio
March 16, 2018, 3:44 p.m.(5/15/1008 AR)
Relationship Note on Ennettia
An old friend from the South warn--informed me that one of my relations was visiting the city. And when I look into the matter, it seems that is the dear Ennettia, and she is joining the Inquisition. I dearly wish that I could capture the sound of my laughter, for then I could send a letter to Prince Laric containing nothing but.
Welcome to Arx, Lady Ennettia. We should have dinner at some point.
Welcome to Arx, Lady Ennettia. We should have dinner at some point.
Written By Orazio
March 12, 2018, 10:18 p.m.(5/8/1008 AR)
Relationship Note on Corban
Lord Corban is always a genteel, educated, and honorable conversational partner. It is a pleasure to speak with him, even when we don't agree.
Although he has, perhaps, been spending too much time around Lycene nobility - I expect an Oathlands noble to blush when saying some things to a priest's face.
Although he has, perhaps, been spending too much time around Lycene nobility - I expect an Oathlands noble to blush when saying some things to a priest's face.
Written By Orazio
March 11, 2018, 1:13 p.m.(5/5/1008 AR)
Relationship Note on Gwenna
A most interesting young woman, and a credit to her House, at least on first impression. Someone who understands the value of diplomacy, and the obligations of nobility to their sworn oaths, without falling into the easy traps of heartlessness and cynicism. With seasoning, she could be a Voice to be reckoned with among all the Great Houses. I quite enjoyed our discussion, and I hope to have others in the future.
Written By Orazio
March 9, 2018, 3:58 p.m.(5/1/1008 AR)
Relationship Note on Ida
I consider your offer to be a wonderful idea.
And, of course, that goes for any other crafter or tradesperson who would be willing to take on one of the orphaned or abandoned children in the city as an apprentice. All of the children, of course, receive education from the Faith, but particularly for those who approach adulthood, it's valuable for them to make connections and learn a profession that can sustain them. Some choose to join the Faith as godsworn, and we are grateful for their service, but not all are interested in that path.
The Faith is, of course, willing to provide reasonable subsidies to thank those who agree to serve as mentors and instructors to the children for their time, effort, and expertise.
And, of course, that goes for any other crafter or tradesperson who would be willing to take on one of the orphaned or abandoned children in the city as an apprentice. All of the children, of course, receive education from the Faith, but particularly for those who approach adulthood, it's valuable for them to make connections and learn a profession that can sustain them. Some choose to join the Faith as godsworn, and we are grateful for their service, but not all are interested in that path.
The Faith is, of course, willing to provide reasonable subsidies to thank those who agree to serve as mentors and instructors to the children for their time, effort, and expertise.
Written By Orazio
March 9, 2018, 1:20 p.m.(5/1/1008 AR)
To the Faithful Reader:
A few musings on a matter which seems to have consumed several journals I read - the adoption and ennoblement of two children to House Pravus. It is in the spirit of charity and generosity, beloved of Gild, to provide shelter and love to children who may be orphaned or whose parents can no longer take care of them. These children, however, are not. They have both living mother and living father, however in disgrace the latter might be. I confess I am curious as to why father and mother abandoned their own responsibilities to the children and instead gave them into the care of strangers of no blood relation.
Further, it is worth noting that it is possible to give children shelter and love and a place to belong without also raising them to the nobility for no good reason and even outside their own fealty. Of course, it is an interesting move politically - now, when these children reach adulthood, they may bring war and strife to not one, but two fealties: a Great House and one of the most powerful Duchies of the Lyceum, by virtue of both blood and adoption. But, by all means, teach them to desire the finer things in life, raise them to feel entitled to power, train them to lead and persuade people to their causes, and then - one supposes - attempt to trade them off as marriage fodder to the minor vassals who will be satisfied and not insulted with being bound to common-born adoptees instead of blooded members of the House. Or perhaps they will simply marry for 'love', maybe even to commoners, themselves. It's the popular thing, these days.
Of course, this is the Lyceum we're talking about. If they're very good students of their teachings, one of them may take an interest in the apothecary arts and we shall have a most unusual Duke or Duchess fifteen years down the line, owing to the rest of the family having some unfortunate accidents at mealtimes. It wouldn't be the choice I would make for the well-being of my House and family, but it should at least prove exciting.
A few musings on a matter which seems to have consumed several journals I read - the adoption and ennoblement of two children to House Pravus. It is in the spirit of charity and generosity, beloved of Gild, to provide shelter and love to children who may be orphaned or whose parents can no longer take care of them. These children, however, are not. They have both living mother and living father, however in disgrace the latter might be. I confess I am curious as to why father and mother abandoned their own responsibilities to the children and instead gave them into the care of strangers of no blood relation.
Further, it is worth noting that it is possible to give children shelter and love and a place to belong without also raising them to the nobility for no good reason and even outside their own fealty. Of course, it is an interesting move politically - now, when these children reach adulthood, they may bring war and strife to not one, but two fealties: a Great House and one of the most powerful Duchies of the Lyceum, by virtue of both blood and adoption. But, by all means, teach them to desire the finer things in life, raise them to feel entitled to power, train them to lead and persuade people to their causes, and then - one supposes - attempt to trade them off as marriage fodder to the minor vassals who will be satisfied and not insulted with being bound to common-born adoptees instead of blooded members of the House. Or perhaps they will simply marry for 'love', maybe even to commoners, themselves. It's the popular thing, these days.
Of course, this is the Lyceum we're talking about. If they're very good students of their teachings, one of them may take an interest in the apothecary arts and we shall have a most unusual Duke or Duchess fifteen years down the line, owing to the rest of the family having some unfortunate accidents at mealtimes. It wouldn't be the choice I would make for the well-being of my House and family, but it should at least prove exciting.
Written By Orazio
March 5, 2018, 11:08 p.m.(4/22/1008 AR)
Relationship Note on Thena
I am willing to wager that you will still find the insistence intensely irritating. And further willing to wager that as I am your almost direct superior, you won't /actually/ stab me for it.
The possibility that I could be wrong about one or both of those things is what makes it exciting, really.
The possibility that I could be wrong about one or both of those things is what makes it exciting, really.
Written By Orazio
March 5, 2018, 10:52 p.m.(4/22/1008 AR)
Relationship Note on Calaudrin
It would be a poor thing for a man's last wish to be disregarded. You may consider it done, although I would prefer you return back alive. I can insist the will exists regardless.
Written By Orazio
March 5, 2018, 4:38 p.m.(4/21/1008 AR)
Relationship Note on Thena
Note to self: As a present for coming home in one piece, arrange advanced horse riding and combat lessons for Dame Thena.
Written By Orazio
Feb. 22, 2018, 9:19 a.m.(3/27/1008 AR)
Relationship Note on Tibaltus
Reading Brother Tibaltus' journal is rather humbling, as he states the point I was trying to get across, and does it in far fewer words with far greater clarity, without diversions into random theological asides. It is a pleasure to have him weigh in on the matter.
Written By Orazio
Feb. 22, 2018, 7:36 a.m.(3/27/1008 AR)
Relationship Note on Ann
We do not have conflicting doctrines, Princess Ann, because the Faith takes care to ensure that doctrine involves equal consideration of all the gods' virtues, rather than championing one over the others. However, that is not the same as suppressing the expression of a god's virtue, nor does it mean that the demands of those virtues may not conflict when considering the righteous choice in a given situation, nor that each of those competing demands should not be heard and considered. Even the gods may have their debates, although we are rarely privileged to hear such, although their fundamental virtue and righteousness would prevent them from coming to direct conflict for anything other than truly irreconcilable differences. Humans, being less virtuous and righteous by definition, may come to direct conflict much earlier in the process.
To your other point, I would say first that the gods did not give us Skald, but rather Skald chose of his own will to create humanity and aid those who were in chains. I suspect he would rather not be thought of as a present to be handed out for good, or bad, behavior. That said, it may be worthwhile to study your history. The Faith has brought the worship of the gods to the continent through force in many cases, and where spiritual guidance and reason fail, may maintain it via the swords of the Templars. We are not a pacifist Church, and yet the gods stand with us. None of the Houses are pacifist, and yet the gods stand with them - or abandon them, should they fall too far from the righteous path. When two Houses go to war, both might display the virtues of the gods in their actions and deeds, although they stand apart on the source of their conflict. Likewise, two Houses may be unified in heresy and blasphemy, and the gods shall stand apart from them without hesitation, and the Church shall send Templars to settle the matter lest the corruption spread across the Compact. The gods will not continue to stand with one who violates their principles, nor will the Church, although all might hope that the wayward will abandon their misbehavior and return home. But it is not the nature of any of the gods to say, "Ah, this person commits human sacrifice to dark powers, but I'm sure they're really nice on the inside, so we should forgive them and remain unified."
Unity is not a virtue. But the righteous, by the actions they take which are righteous, are more likely (but not guaranteed) to stand together than apart.
To your other point, I would say first that the gods did not give us Skald, but rather Skald chose of his own will to create humanity and aid those who were in chains. I suspect he would rather not be thought of as a present to be handed out for good, or bad, behavior. That said, it may be worthwhile to study your history. The Faith has brought the worship of the gods to the continent through force in many cases, and where spiritual guidance and reason fail, may maintain it via the swords of the Templars. We are not a pacifist Church, and yet the gods stand with us. None of the Houses are pacifist, and yet the gods stand with them - or abandon them, should they fall too far from the righteous path. When two Houses go to war, both might display the virtues of the gods in their actions and deeds, although they stand apart on the source of their conflict. Likewise, two Houses may be unified in heresy and blasphemy, and the gods shall stand apart from them without hesitation, and the Church shall send Templars to settle the matter lest the corruption spread across the Compact. The gods will not continue to stand with one who violates their principles, nor will the Church, although all might hope that the wayward will abandon their misbehavior and return home. But it is not the nature of any of the gods to say, "Ah, this person commits human sacrifice to dark powers, but I'm sure they're really nice on the inside, so we should forgive them and remain unified."
Unity is not a virtue. But the righteous, by the actions they take which are righteous, are more likely (but not guaranteed) to stand together than apart.
Written By Orazio
Feb. 21, 2018, 11 p.m.(3/26/1008 AR)
First, allow me to humbly thank all of those who shared their thoughts and spiritual understandings of the gods and the spirits, both in entries posted in the white journals, and in letters sent directly to me. Although my position in some regards remains unchanged, I believe that I have a better understanding of some people’s attitudes and perceptions of the spirits, and their place in their lives. Please consider my door open for further discussion on these subjects, although it is unlikely to change the Faith’s official position on spirit worship.
However, there are other sentiments I see pointed out to me in various white journals that I feel it would be remiss of me not to address. The first of these is an appeal to ‘unity’. It should be noted that there is no god of the Pantheon who champions unity as their virtue, and for good reason. Unity is not a virtue, and even the gods do not speak, think, or believe in lockstep with one another. If Justice must be served, then the Sentinel will speak, whether its words cause consternation or not. If there is a Change which must be acknowledged and considered in that judgment, then Lagoma has no fear of raising her voice to champion that change. And even among the Pantheon, there stands Tehom, who reminds us that we cannot ignore what is uncomfortable, and that even distasteful or threatening arguments should be heard and considered, lest ill-considered unity leads us into confusion and darkness. This does not stand in opposition to love, but rather is the fulfilment of it. Remember that Limerance is the god of a purer love than the warm, fuzzy romantic feelings that bring us joy and make us smile - he is the god of Fidelity, of holding fast to one’s oaths, commitments, and to the obligations that each of us have to one another, be it liege to vassal, parent to child, or brother and sister united in Faith. To look away from the misbehavior of another is not to say, “I love you too much to hurt you,” it is instead to say, “I don’t love you, or the principles you have broken, enough to stand fast and correct you, even though it might make you angry, or sad.”
Further, there are those who will say, “Now is not the time for dissent, for we are war.” If not now, I say, then when? The Compact was forged in war, and it has been in some part at war for nearly its entire history since then - and even our children’s children are not likely to see an end to the conflict we have joined. War is our constant companion, and we train our children and our people to survive it with every generation. Gloria stands as the goddess of war and honor together, not “Honor unless it would make winning a war difficult.” If it were easy, then it would hardly be a virtue for humanity to struggle for and aspire to - it is choosing honor and righteousness when there is a /cost/ to that choice that gives it power and meaning in the world, and proves the value such sentiments hold for ourselves. A war fought without honor and without demanding honor from our allies is a war that is not in Gloria’s sight, and one that we do not deserve to win.
Remember, children of the Faith: It is not love to follow others into darkness; rather, it is love to hold the torch as high and steady as you can, so that those who are lost might always find their way back to the light, should they choose.
However, there are other sentiments I see pointed out to me in various white journals that I feel it would be remiss of me not to address. The first of these is an appeal to ‘unity’. It should be noted that there is no god of the Pantheon who champions unity as their virtue, and for good reason. Unity is not a virtue, and even the gods do not speak, think, or believe in lockstep with one another. If Justice must be served, then the Sentinel will speak, whether its words cause consternation or not. If there is a Change which must be acknowledged and considered in that judgment, then Lagoma has no fear of raising her voice to champion that change. And even among the Pantheon, there stands Tehom, who reminds us that we cannot ignore what is uncomfortable, and that even distasteful or threatening arguments should be heard and considered, lest ill-considered unity leads us into confusion and darkness. This does not stand in opposition to love, but rather is the fulfilment of it. Remember that Limerance is the god of a purer love than the warm, fuzzy romantic feelings that bring us joy and make us smile - he is the god of Fidelity, of holding fast to one’s oaths, commitments, and to the obligations that each of us have to one another, be it liege to vassal, parent to child, or brother and sister united in Faith. To look away from the misbehavior of another is not to say, “I love you too much to hurt you,” it is instead to say, “I don’t love you, or the principles you have broken, enough to stand fast and correct you, even though it might make you angry, or sad.”
Further, there are those who will say, “Now is not the time for dissent, for we are war.” If not now, I say, then when? The Compact was forged in war, and it has been in some part at war for nearly its entire history since then - and even our children’s children are not likely to see an end to the conflict we have joined. War is our constant companion, and we train our children and our people to survive it with every generation. Gloria stands as the goddess of war and honor together, not “Honor unless it would make winning a war difficult.” If it were easy, then it would hardly be a virtue for humanity to struggle for and aspire to - it is choosing honor and righteousness when there is a /cost/ to that choice that gives it power and meaning in the world, and proves the value such sentiments hold for ourselves. A war fought without honor and without demanding honor from our allies is a war that is not in Gloria’s sight, and one that we do not deserve to win.
Remember, children of the Faith: It is not love to follow others into darkness; rather, it is love to hold the torch as high and steady as you can, so that those who are lost might always find their way back to the light, should they choose.
Written By Orazio
Feb. 20, 2018, 5:19 p.m.(3/23/1008 AR)
Relationship Note on Shard
Mistress Shard, thank you as well.
For someone who feared they would not be able to help, I have found your words quite helpful. For me, when I consider my worship of the gods, there is an element of submission and awe involved in how I see them, how I offer to them. We sometimes do offer up a sacrifice to show our devotion to the gods, although these are rarely physical things, but rather vows of poverty, chastity, or - as in the case of godsworn - oaths against marriage or children, and the sacrifice of our fealty to our family. These are not things demanded by the gods, however; indeed, the gods have often touched or proclaimed their love for those who have offered none of those sacrifices. It is not a transactional relationship, but then, that may be because the gods have already given us more than we can ever repay: our very souls, and our existence as a human people. There could be no equal transaction that would match that, even if the gods did nothing more on this world, so we offer up what we can, in gratitude and love.
And yet, I do understand a part of what you say - the idea of honoring something you respect by giving up something worthwhile is something that anyone of honor can relate to. And our goddess Gild is proof enough that trade is not, in and of itself, inherently wrong (although like anything, it can be exploited towards cruelty and injustice). I appreciate your willingness to share your understanding.
For someone who feared they would not be able to help, I have found your words quite helpful. For me, when I consider my worship of the gods, there is an element of submission and awe involved in how I see them, how I offer to them. We sometimes do offer up a sacrifice to show our devotion to the gods, although these are rarely physical things, but rather vows of poverty, chastity, or - as in the case of godsworn - oaths against marriage or children, and the sacrifice of our fealty to our family. These are not things demanded by the gods, however; indeed, the gods have often touched or proclaimed their love for those who have offered none of those sacrifices. It is not a transactional relationship, but then, that may be because the gods have already given us more than we can ever repay: our very souls, and our existence as a human people. There could be no equal transaction that would match that, even if the gods did nothing more on this world, so we offer up what we can, in gratitude and love.
And yet, I do understand a part of what you say - the idea of honoring something you respect by giving up something worthwhile is something that anyone of honor can relate to. And our goddess Gild is proof enough that trade is not, in and of itself, inherently wrong (although like anything, it can be exploited towards cruelty and injustice). I appreciate your willingness to share your understanding.
Written By Orazio
Feb. 20, 2018, 5:09 p.m.(3/23/1008 AR)
Relationship Note on Thesarin
Thank you, Count Thesarin, for your words in your journal explaining your people's beliefs and their origins. I appreciate you sharing your perspective, and I will think on it.
Written By Orazio
Feb. 20, 2018, 2:13 p.m.(3/23/1008 AR)
Relationship Note on Shard
That is a sensible and practical concern. Nor do I fully reject the concept of spirits nor that they can be helpful (or harmful) in the rare occasions they choose to interact with humanity. I admit that I do struggle with the concept of worshiping such beings. I understand why one worships the Pantheon. The gods are the greatest virtues of humanity and the higher powers of the world. They love us without asking anything in return, without bargaining or demands. And even were they not to respond at all to our prayers, they remain the representation of everything a human being should aspire to. Fidelity, Love, Justice, Choice, Wisdom, Honor, Charity, the willingness to Change, Dominion and Stewardship, Creation, the proper cycle of life and Death, the giving of sustenance, the willingness to recognize our own darkness and overcome it.
These are things worth championing, worth worshiping, worth giving up my family and my hope of children to serve, now and for always. I remain uncertain of the purpose of worship of spirits. How do they make the world, or humanity, a better place? What love and regard do they have for us who are creations of the gods?
Please don't take this as a demand for an answer, although I would be interested in the thoughts of those who have chosen a shamanistic path. I simply don't truly understand the appeal, I suppose.
These are things worth championing, worth worshiping, worth giving up my family and my hope of children to serve, now and for always. I remain uncertain of the purpose of worship of spirits. How do they make the world, or humanity, a better place? What love and regard do they have for us who are creations of the gods?
Please don't take this as a demand for an answer, although I would be interested in the thoughts of those who have chosen a shamanistic path. I simply don't truly understand the appeal, I suppose.
Written By Orazio
Feb. 20, 2018, 9:14 a.m.(3/23/1008 AR)
It's always a pleasure to awaken of a morning to nervous acolytes and a stack of copied entries from various white journals, with nary an overwrought love poem among them.
Wait, no. Not pleasure. I mean the other thing.
While I have not had my tea, and thus will certainly not be trying to issue a point by point rebuttal to anything in particular, I shall say a few things.
First, while I do see much of the same disrespect that Sir Preston has noted, although by no means confined to the Oathlands, I will say that if one is going to 'call out' behavior, it is best to do it specifically and to name names. Being vague only diverts the conversation to people's insecurities, rather than specific points of behavior. For example:
Lord Vano's journal is a prime example of a most concerning trend with Valardin leadership of late. Lord Vano clearly states that his House was allowed to bend the knee without even a token conversion to the syncretic practice of the Faith which was allowed as a specific exemption to the Redrain lands, for their legendary courage and valor. And that he, as a noble of the Compact, feels comfortable stating that he is 'faithless'. That Prince Edain has accepted not just the Rivenshari but multiple heathen Prodigal Houses into the heartland of the Faith without requiring conversion is without precedent, and should be deeply concerning to any devout member of the Faith, but particularly anyone who shares privileges and vassal rights with them.
More, there seems to be a growing feeling among the nobility that the practice of shamanism is somehow of equal value to the practice of the Faith. Now, it is understandable that this would appeal to the nobility: shamans wed spiritual and secular power, with nobles often serving as shamans for their House and lands, which is certainly convenient for ensuring that spiritual guidance will always align with the goals of one's House and never give any uncomfortable criticism of the head of the House or any of the family members. Likewise, shamans are not required to give up lands, family, marriage, nor titles, nor are they required to adhere to any true canon or dogma - making it an appealing path for those who like all the warm fuzziness of feeling devout and being a spiritual guide, without having to compromise or give up anything else one might want. Personally, I continue to believe that the gods are more worthy of worship and respect as the embodiments of the virtues that all good men and women should aspire to - but as the nobility seem far more concerned about chastising a common-born soldier for daring to say something less than flattering than they do about opposing dishonor and mass murder in their own ranks, I imagine that praying to the spirit of a rock formation engenders less anxiety than having to consider the reaction of Gloria or the Sentinel to what they choose to speak up about, and where they choose to remain silent.
Other specific actions which one might look to see the current relationship of the nobility to the Faith might recall that when Archduchess Esera was killed, it was not Velenosa who incited the blockade of the Rectory, but Prince Edain, to a resounding lack of protest from any vassals thereof. Or, for that matter, any other fealty. Lest we confine this to Valardin, let us not forget that it was Princess Lark who accused the Dominus of misuse of funds for...buying a sword for his chosen bodyguard. I, myself, have been accused of soliciting bribes by the nobility, and have had the Church accused of causing one of our ongoing issues by "lying to people for centuries" about doctrine. When Prince Victus defiled the Shrine of Mangata, much of Thrax nobility was quick to blame the Faith for their own High Lord's actions, to a resounding silence from the other fealties, including those who would proclaim to be most devout. Indeed, few have had any qualms from continuing to take naval orders from a High Lord who has sheltered a mass murderer, and a Duchess who has supported and defended the defilement of her House Blade, and thus the honor of her House, and reiterated that defense only recently in these very journals.
But, yes, clearly the true problem here is that a Templar made a vague insinuation that some people are not as respectful as they could be towards the Faith Militant. Please, continue to complain about that until the next terrible deed done by the peerage, so that you can be silent once again.
Wait, no. Not pleasure. I mean the other thing.
While I have not had my tea, and thus will certainly not be trying to issue a point by point rebuttal to anything in particular, I shall say a few things.
First, while I do see much of the same disrespect that Sir Preston has noted, although by no means confined to the Oathlands, I will say that if one is going to 'call out' behavior, it is best to do it specifically and to name names. Being vague only diverts the conversation to people's insecurities, rather than specific points of behavior. For example:
Lord Vano's journal is a prime example of a most concerning trend with Valardin leadership of late. Lord Vano clearly states that his House was allowed to bend the knee without even a token conversion to the syncretic practice of the Faith which was allowed as a specific exemption to the Redrain lands, for their legendary courage and valor. And that he, as a noble of the Compact, feels comfortable stating that he is 'faithless'. That Prince Edain has accepted not just the Rivenshari but multiple heathen Prodigal Houses into the heartland of the Faith without requiring conversion is without precedent, and should be deeply concerning to any devout member of the Faith, but particularly anyone who shares privileges and vassal rights with them.
More, there seems to be a growing feeling among the nobility that the practice of shamanism is somehow of equal value to the practice of the Faith. Now, it is understandable that this would appeal to the nobility: shamans wed spiritual and secular power, with nobles often serving as shamans for their House and lands, which is certainly convenient for ensuring that spiritual guidance will always align with the goals of one's House and never give any uncomfortable criticism of the head of the House or any of the family members. Likewise, shamans are not required to give up lands, family, marriage, nor titles, nor are they required to adhere to any true canon or dogma - making it an appealing path for those who like all the warm fuzziness of feeling devout and being a spiritual guide, without having to compromise or give up anything else one might want. Personally, I continue to believe that the gods are more worthy of worship and respect as the embodiments of the virtues that all good men and women should aspire to - but as the nobility seem far more concerned about chastising a common-born soldier for daring to say something less than flattering than they do about opposing dishonor and mass murder in their own ranks, I imagine that praying to the spirit of a rock formation engenders less anxiety than having to consider the reaction of Gloria or the Sentinel to what they choose to speak up about, and where they choose to remain silent.
Other specific actions which one might look to see the current relationship of the nobility to the Faith might recall that when Archduchess Esera was killed, it was not Velenosa who incited the blockade of the Rectory, but Prince Edain, to a resounding lack of protest from any vassals thereof. Or, for that matter, any other fealty. Lest we confine this to Valardin, let us not forget that it was Princess Lark who accused the Dominus of misuse of funds for...buying a sword for his chosen bodyguard. I, myself, have been accused of soliciting bribes by the nobility, and have had the Church accused of causing one of our ongoing issues by "lying to people for centuries" about doctrine. When Prince Victus defiled the Shrine of Mangata, much of Thrax nobility was quick to blame the Faith for their own High Lord's actions, to a resounding silence from the other fealties, including those who would proclaim to be most devout. Indeed, few have had any qualms from continuing to take naval orders from a High Lord who has sheltered a mass murderer, and a Duchess who has supported and defended the defilement of her House Blade, and thus the honor of her House, and reiterated that defense only recently in these very journals.
But, yes, clearly the true problem here is that a Templar made a vague insinuation that some people are not as respectful as they could be towards the Faith Militant. Please, continue to complain about that until the next terrible deed done by the peerage, so that you can be silent once again.
Written By Orazio
Feb. 16, 2018, 8:12 p.m.(3/16/1008 AR)
Although many people prefer to dictate journals to Scholars, I have always preferred to pen my own words, at least in the Whites. Not because the Scholars do not do a wonderful job at their work, but because I like to travel to various places in the city to write my journal entries. Often, I write them at the Queensrest, usually with a pot of tea or glass or wine at hand. Many times, I will write at Judgment Green near where the proclaimers and speakers can be found. I enjoy listening to the debates of the day as I write.
Today, I am at the walkways at the top of the Seawatch South walls, bracing the journal against the stone and rather awkwardly juggling pen and ink. The walkways are not too busy today; a late winter day, overcast, with a cutting wind from the sea is not typically a pleasant time to be atop walls. But I am enjoying it. The wind claws at worries, fears, and irritations, scouring them away even as it chills me to the bone. Below and beyond me, I can see the Lowers laid out, and beyond that, the grey, choppy sea itself. Sea birds float over the masts of ships; a large volume of ships, more than usual, I think. And no wonder, considering the times. It's beautiful, in a cold and removed sort of way - like a sculpture of crystal, protected behind glass because it is too fragile to ever touch.
Today, I am at the walkways at the top of the Seawatch South walls, bracing the journal against the stone and rather awkwardly juggling pen and ink. The walkways are not too busy today; a late winter day, overcast, with a cutting wind from the sea is not typically a pleasant time to be atop walls. But I am enjoying it. The wind claws at worries, fears, and irritations, scouring them away even as it chills me to the bone. Below and beyond me, I can see the Lowers laid out, and beyond that, the grey, choppy sea itself. Sea birds float over the masts of ships; a large volume of ships, more than usual, I think. And no wonder, considering the times. It's beautiful, in a cold and removed sort of way - like a sculpture of crystal, protected behind glass because it is too fragile to ever touch.
Written By Orazio
Feb. 13, 2018, 9:56 a.m.(3/2/1008 AR)
On the matter of Esra: The Faith's official response has already been made, so what follows are my own, personal thoughts on the young man, his regrettable demise, and the surrounding situation:
First, Esra's excommunication was deeply regretted, but absolutely necessary. Not because what he attempted to reveal harmed the Faith in any way - most adults are aware that every organization has information which is not for public consumption, and that is as true for the Faith as it is for the Crown, or a merchant family, although the reasons for protecting that information may be different. But because each Scholar is given a sacred trust to protect the information that they are given; it is the only way that such traditions as black journals could endure. People trust the Scholars not to use what they hear and what they read for personal or organizational gain, and when a Scholar - or a formal Scholar - breaks that trust in such spectacular fashion, it must be addressed, lest the entire institution suffer. I bore the young man no personal animus; indeed, I don't think I ever even met him. But I would make the same decision for any Scholar who broke faith in such a fashion, including the Archscholar herself, if it were necessary. As always, it is hoped that when an excommunication occurs, that it is taken not as a rejection, but as an opportunity to recognize one's wrongdoing and repent, hopefully to be welcomed back into the embrace of the Faith. It was my hope that Esra could do this, and perhaps even reconcile with his family, one day.
He never got that chance. Master Costas claims that he took Esra's life in self-defense, and no definitive evidence exists, to my knowledge, to dispute that claim. So we shall allow it to stand, and the taking of the life itself then becomes a tragedy. And if the man who took that life was anyone other than a House Sword, and the weapon used anything other than a House Blade, I would view it as nothing more than a regrettable tragedy and little of the Faith's affair. But that position holds a special place of pride and honor in our society, embodied in the weapon. Among any member of the nobility, the thought of one's trusted Sword being involved in such events should bring a shudder of distaste, and the idea of the embodiment of one's House honor being used to kill in a personal dispute should be abhorrent.
Honor is not a convenient thing, to be embraced when it is easy, and then set aside when it is inconvenient. Honor is the binding glue of the Compact, that which allows each House to trust the other within the bounds of tradition and custom. It should not be overlooked simply because it is thought that a person is a wonderful drinking companion, nor because they're very good at killing people you don't like on a battlefield. Courage and honor involve standing up for what is right, even if means correcting people you like, or who you love, or who you otherwise agree with.
It isn't enjoyable to issue such corrections, and I wish to all the gods that they were not as necessary or as frequent as they have been, of late. But if I failed to do so, then I would be failing in my duties as a priest, and as a citizen of the Compact that I have given my word to protect and preserve.
First, Esra's excommunication was deeply regretted, but absolutely necessary. Not because what he attempted to reveal harmed the Faith in any way - most adults are aware that every organization has information which is not for public consumption, and that is as true for the Faith as it is for the Crown, or a merchant family, although the reasons for protecting that information may be different. But because each Scholar is given a sacred trust to protect the information that they are given; it is the only way that such traditions as black journals could endure. People trust the Scholars not to use what they hear and what they read for personal or organizational gain, and when a Scholar - or a formal Scholar - breaks that trust in such spectacular fashion, it must be addressed, lest the entire institution suffer. I bore the young man no personal animus; indeed, I don't think I ever even met him. But I would make the same decision for any Scholar who broke faith in such a fashion, including the Archscholar herself, if it were necessary. As always, it is hoped that when an excommunication occurs, that it is taken not as a rejection, but as an opportunity to recognize one's wrongdoing and repent, hopefully to be welcomed back into the embrace of the Faith. It was my hope that Esra could do this, and perhaps even reconcile with his family, one day.
He never got that chance. Master Costas claims that he took Esra's life in self-defense, and no definitive evidence exists, to my knowledge, to dispute that claim. So we shall allow it to stand, and the taking of the life itself then becomes a tragedy. And if the man who took that life was anyone other than a House Sword, and the weapon used anything other than a House Blade, I would view it as nothing more than a regrettable tragedy and little of the Faith's affair. But that position holds a special place of pride and honor in our society, embodied in the weapon. Among any member of the nobility, the thought of one's trusted Sword being involved in such events should bring a shudder of distaste, and the idea of the embodiment of one's House honor being used to kill in a personal dispute should be abhorrent.
Honor is not a convenient thing, to be embraced when it is easy, and then set aside when it is inconvenient. Honor is the binding glue of the Compact, that which allows each House to trust the other within the bounds of tradition and custom. It should not be overlooked simply because it is thought that a person is a wonderful drinking companion, nor because they're very good at killing people you don't like on a battlefield. Courage and honor involve standing up for what is right, even if means correcting people you like, or who you love, or who you otherwise agree with.
It isn't enjoyable to issue such corrections, and I wish to all the gods that they were not as necessary or as frequent as they have been, of late. But if I failed to do so, then I would be failing in my duties as a priest, and as a citizen of the Compact that I have given my word to protect and preserve.
Please note that the scholars may take some time preparing your journal for others to read.